Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0477

reference
163-tree-1
name
0477
tree-preservation-order

undefined

163-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.002220 50.850135)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.002178 50.850130,-1.002180 50.850139,-1.002186 50.850146,-1.002195 50.850152,-1.002207 50.850156,-1.002220 50.850158,-1.002233 50.850157,-1.002245 50.850153,-1.002255 50.850147,-1.002261 50.850139,-1.002263 50.850131,-1.002261 50.850123,-1.002255 50.850115,-1.002246 50.850109,-1.002234 50.850105,-1.002221 50.850104,-1.002208 50.850105,-1.002196 50.850109,-1.002186 50.850115,-1.002180 50.850122,-1.002178 50.850130)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL